A lost cause: the search for an unbiased journalist

by Lee Hopkins on July 17, 2008 · 0 comments

in ethics

If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. You can even subscribe by email! Thanks for visiting!

Journalist ethics and a lack of bias - is there such a thing?

Starting with a rant by one of my favourite ‘hot button’ pushers, @Stilgherrian, Laurel Papworth (another who’s blood deserves bottling and saving for future generations) joins in on the ‘Journalists have ethics, bloggers have none and are therefore scum of the earth’ meme that surprisingly STILL resonates around media conferences, despite some of the most ‘followed’ bloggers being ex-journos or current law professors (talking here of Glenn Reynolds).

Miss Silkcharm says:

Let’s compile a compendium of unethical traditional media behavior - not so we can be mean to journalists. No, I quite like them, the little poppets. But so we can respond at conferences and debates and such, when we are told we are rubbish. We nod and say yes - of course we are - everything we ever learned about media we learned from journalists. and What a brilliant example they have set for us all. Particularly their standards and their ethics. And then we list off the incidences that make Media Watch giggle. Heh.

So let’s hop on over to Laurel’s blog and start leaving examples in the comments about journalistic practices that might best be described as “errr… just what are you thinking?”

{ 0 comments… add one now }

Leave a Comment

You can use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Previous post: For work-from-home consultants: how to fold a fitted sheet

Next post: New GTD whitepaper for Outlook 2007