The corporate blogger’s professional project

by Lee Hopkins on November 8, 2005 · 3 comments

in miscellaneous

If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. You can even subscribe by email! Thanks for visiting!

Professional bloggers - will they be ex-journos or something else entirely?Reading John Cass’ post regarding the dilution and potential devaluation of traditional journalistic skills by corporate bloggers (which is a continuation of a conversation started by John here and commented upon by me here), I am reminded of the professional project I studied in my Honours year at university — nursing.

Some leading-edge, thought leadership Nurses realised that they would always be playing ‘Rosencrantz & Guildenstern’-ish second fiddle to God-like doctors unless they achieved several things:

  1. changed their profession’s skill set
  2. changed the general public’s perception of them
  3. changed the doctors’ perceptions of them
  4. changed their own perceptions of themselves

To this end they started a ‘professional project’: to radically change what nursing means to all of its publics.

My wife, a Registered Nurse, is currently studying to become a Nurse Practitioner in Orthopaedics — someone who can examine patients and make diagnoses and treatment plans in her own right; she would have recourse to specialist help when required but would, in the main, be expected to see and treat the bell-curve majority of patients requiring orthopaedic intervention.

She is fortunate to have a mentor in a colleague at the same hospital who is one of, if not the, first nurse practitioners in orthopaedics in Australia.

I mention this because it may well transpire that, should corporate blogging become a ‘proper’ job with a recognised skill set (and I’m not convinced that traditional journalistic skills are enough — there needs also, perhaps, to be a modicum of ‘people skills’, especially where the blog’s audience is the general, lay public), then there may well be a requirement to determine a specific career path for corporate bloggers into either corporate marcomms or PR.

The product and process knowledge base required to be a corporate blogger will exclude ‘first jobbers’ from the role — the blogger will need to have an acute ear/eye for what is driving customer conversation as well as how to drive customer conversation, underpinned by the need to have answers to customer questions at their fingertips in order to have credibility as a spokesperson for the organisation.

What sort of animal is this corporate blogger going to be?

  • a wordsmith
  • a ‘people-person’ for retail blogs
  • skilled facilitator
  • highly knowledgeable about their area of expertise (what they are blogging about)
  • able to rapidly and easily liaise with other areas of the organisation
  • customer-focused
  • not afraid of technology (because the tools of engagement will develop/change rapidly)

Yes, there are paid bloggers out there at the moment who may or may not have these skill sets. But until the ‘corporate blogger’ becomes a mainstream corporate idea these individuals will always be ‘outliers’.

Once the ‘blogger’ becomes a more permanent fixture on the corporate Jobs Noticeboard then it will be interesting to see what sort of animal emerges.

My guess is that corporates will get it wrong at first and hire junior staff to blog on their behalf. A mistake because these bloggers will very quickly be found to be lacking the experience required to engage their audience and answer their questions, thus damaging the brand experience for the customer. A few savvy corporates will get it right (witness GM) but until bloggers start their own Professional Project then I am afraid that credibility, and financial reward, will be in very short supply.

{ 3 comments… read them below or add one }

1 john cass 11.08.05 at 7:31 am

Lee,

Great post, and I am going to think about it and maybe write more.

I did want to follow up on your mention of General Motors however, while I do think that the GM Fastlane Blog is a great blog. Having Bob Lutz blog is great; I have found some issues with the blog. The site has mentioned quite a few times that all comments are read, and that the company cannot respond to every comment. Except each person who comments may not read that post. So I believe that there is an expectation on the part of a number of customers that they will receive a response from GM, when in fact they will not. My suggestion in an earlier post was that at the point of commenting, near the comment submission box the GM Fastlane blog set the expectation that a person commenting will have their comment read, but will probably not receive a response.

I interviewed two GM customers and both were disappointed with the lack of response from GM.

John

2 Lee 11.08.05 at 10:22 am

I agree, John.

If you set the wrong expectations you deserve the wrong response. Thus any corporate blogger needs to clearly spell out that they will or will not reply to every post, either via the blog or personally.

Looking forward to your reply…

3 john cass 11.19.05 at 9:54 am

Lee,

Well I agree, and you have hit the nail on the head, it’s all about setting expectations. Let me ask a question, have you ever had trouble communicating through email and the web? Is it just easier sometimes to pick up the telephone and talk? Well that difficulty with communicating through electronic means comes in part because each of us brings different expectations to the conversation. If you set the expectations or don’t assume anything about the other party, your conversation will flow more easily online.

I think every company should think about these issues when designing their blog, and when managing their blog. Essentially, consider at the very least how to interact with your readers, notifications etc. But beyond that consider what your readers think the conventions are when you blog as a corporation.

John

Leave a Comment

You can use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Previous post: Top 10 Sources selects Nova Spivak

Next post: PubSub PR rankings: how will they shake out?