Performance accountability for a corporate communicator

by Lee on March 19, 2005 · 0 comments

in miscellaneous

If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. You can even subscribe by email! Thanks for visiting!

If we take as granted that the role of the corporate communicator is to add value to the dialogic exchange between a company and its constituent audiences, then how does one measure one’s own performance?

Is it by how many printed or pdf’d newsletters we get out in a period?

Is it by reader response metrics, like “Did you receive our in-house newsletter?” and “Did you read it?”

Is it by how many blogs per week, or podcasts, we write/produce?

Is it by increased takeup of most wanted responses (MWRs) such as new procedural directives or customers responding to ‘call/write us’ initiatives?

We cannot rely on just consumer sales or in-house work process conversions alone, since multiple factors usually impinge on the data — like other DM initiatives, POS material or in-house managerial pressure.

Where does the role of a communication pro end and a marketing/PR pro begin? Is there, indeed, any division? If there is a division does the Communications Professional risk playing ’second fiddle’ to PR and Marketing pros?

So how DO we value ourselves and our contributions to the marketplace and our clients/employers?

How do YOU value yourself? I’d love to hear your views…

{ 0 comments… add one now }

Leave a Comment

You can use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Older post: Introducing blogging and podcasting to management

Newer post: Podding before podding was even known…